Love + Sex

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Shine Women of the Year (Love + Sex): Hillary Rodham Clinton

One of my favorite women in history andone of Time's 100 most important people of the last centuryis Margaret Sanger. She was a crusader for reproductive freedom and fought to educate and empower women about conception and contraception, and then to make birth control accessible to everyone. Among her many activist endeavors, Margaret Sanger founded the organization that eventually became Planned Parenthood Federation of America. She also wrote and spoke many words that could easily rally a new generation of women to fight for their own sexual health rights.

One of Margaret Sanger's quotes has come to mind often in the last year as abortion rights were argued, voted on, and protested as a part of the election:

"No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her body. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother."

I thought of this as I held my own signs high, cast my own ballot, and read with great concern about how close our country teeters on the edge of eradicating women's right to choose. I thought about how I would have done the same during the early 1900s, joining Margaret Sanger in her efforts to keep women informed, safe, and in charge of their own bodies.

I also thought about the women who have stepped forward to continue the education, lobbying, and fighting back whenever our access to birth control, abortion, and medical counseling is threatened. One woman who has pushed Sanger's work into this century and has adamantly championed women's sexual health rights this year is Hillary Rodham Clinton.

For that, we name her Shine's woman of the year for Love + Sex.

We applauded her combined effort with Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, to articulately and aggressively speak out against a rule proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services. The rule, Rodham Clinton and Richards explained, would grant every employee and volunteer of any medical facility the right to refuse to participate in any part of administering abortions, sterilization procedures, and even prescribing birth control.

The rule, they wrote, would not only cost an exorbitant amount of money to run, but would jeopardize women's right to making medical decisions with her doctor, to getting immediate care for life-threatening diseases like HIV, and to getting the contraception she needs.

Whether we voted for you in the primary or not, whether we dreamt you'd be America's first female chief executive or would've picked another woman, you are, by far the clear choice here. We have a long road ahead of us until we are free in the way Margaret Sanger envisioned for us all, but we're farther down the road because of you, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


[photo credit: Stephen J. Boitano/Getty Images Entertainment]
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 30
  • CJ's Avatar
    Posted by CJ Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:43pm PST

    The Margaret Sanger who supported Hitler and programs of eugenics as well as forced sterilisation? Because there's nothing that says freedom like death camps, race based eugenics programs and forced sterilisation--I mean, that's really 'control of your body'.

    Report Abuse
  • lacyc.horn's Avatar
    Posted by lacyc.horn Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:49pm PST

    JUST REMBER THE DEMORCRATIC PARTY FOR ALL WOMEN TO HAVE FREE SPEACH & FREEDOM OF THEM SELF I PERSONALLY WANT TO COMMEND ALL OF THOSE WOMEN WHO HAS STOOD UP & FOUGHTFOR EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL WOMEN & THATS WHAT MAKES ME PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN WE THE PEOPLE ARE FOR LIBERTY & JUSTIS FOR ALL YOURS TRULEY LACY C. HORN

    Report Abuse
  • MochaMama42's Avatar
    Posted by MochaMama42 Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:37am PST

    I'm with CJ...I can't totally get behind Margaret Sanger, however, yes, I agree, women's health, including reproductive knowledge and care is very important.

    Report Abuse
  • springtime's Avatar
    Posted by springtime Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56am PST

    There are so many reasons to admire Hillary. Sure, her flaws have been in the spotlight for numerous years. But she is smart, focused, driven, committed to this country and had the incredible ability to take everything the media threw at her.

    I am not in lock step with all of Sangers 's beliefs, but the quote you have offered on behalf of Sanger is spot on. I know Hillary's voice will always be heard on that very topic.

    Report Abuse
  • writerbabe's Avatar
    Posted by writerbabe Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:49am PST

    Ah yeah. I also have to agree with CJ. And BTW, I don't admire a woman (Hillary) who let her husband exploit so many other women and then stood by him. If she's about women's rights and empowering women, then she should support All women, not just the ones she agrees with or likes. She's strong and very capable; that's why she's such a let down. Why didn't she leave hubby on the curb where he belongs?

    Report Abuse
  • John's Avatar
    Posted by John Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:12am PST

    "JUST REMBER THE DEMORCRATIC PARTY FOR ALL WOMEN TO HAVE FREE SPEACH "

    Do "Demorcrats" support "edumaction" anymore?

    Report Abuse
  • John's Avatar
    Posted by John Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:14am PST

    "There are so many reasons to admire Hillary"

    Definitely. She was the extreme liberal before Barrack Osama came along. She's now the one thing putting his communism into perspective.

    Report Abuse
  • John's Avatar
    Posted by John Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:30am PST

    "I don't admire a woman (Hillary) who let her husband exploit so many other women and then stood by him."

    I think that's a personal issue between them; one you know nothing about. How do you know she doesn't secretly get off on that? They might have considered it better, once the incidents were exposed, to make it look like he was cheating and let his charisma take care of it (which it seemed to do nicely) than to expose the alternate lifestyle of an open relationship to the public. People cheat all the time (she's probably done it herself), but to many people, open relationships are just weird. It's definitely something this country isn't ready for.

    In any case, you don't know what happened other than what the suck-bag media told you, and to make a judgment on that just irresponsible.

    Report Abuse
  • Josie's Avatar
    Posted by Josie Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:10am PST

    Don't love her & never liked her.

    Report Abuse
  • writerbabe's Avatar
    Posted by writerbabe Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:23am PST

    No, sorry. During his presidency many men were taken down because courts held that these men used their positions of power to intimidate women into sexually compromising situations. Clarence Thomas anyone? Airforce scandal? ect. I don't care if they had an open relationship or not. It's clear that Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, and the others weren't aware of an open relationship if there was one. That speaks of cruelty, deception, and oh, dare I say it, abuse of power. Again, if she's such a champion of women, then she'd not tolerate that sort of behavior from her husband. If she was fine with his cheating, hey that's fine with me. I don't care about that. What I care about is a double standard.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 30

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine...

Love Byte

Can a man's height be a deal breaker? Maybe you don’t need a guy to tower over you, but what if you wear heels and your date only comes up to your shoulders?