Sometimes blogging bites you in the butt. By nature the form is raw and the only editor involved is the blogger (that's right: Cookie magazine does not oversee what I post here; I am responsible for everything I put up). So it happens that sometimes you write something you don't dig on second thought. But blogging is your first thought.
I'm not thrilled with the first thought I posted here on the topic of vaccinations and Amanda Peet, who spoke to this magazine in favor of vaccinations.
Like Peet, I'm very much in favor of vaccinations and am fed up with the non-vaccinating community for doing what I believe is harm and they believe is good. That said, my post was extreme in tone, and so I pulled it (and no, I won't be linking back to it). I apologize to anyone who read it and found it distasteful and offensive. It was. I also cop to presenting the case as black and white and skipping over the shades of gray. But let me tell you why.I grew up in Africa where one can still see the effects of diseases many Americans have barely even heard of. And I believe too many people are being encouraged to avoid vaccinations altogether, prompted by misinformation on the part of the non-vaccinating community. Not enough people know some really basic facts, such as the fact that vaccinations have prevented millions of deaths and untold suffering the world over. That there are question marks left with regard to vaccinations is not a fact but a contention. Until I am proven wrong, I believe in erring on the side of maximizing public health, and this means promoting vaccines.
Like Amanda Peet, I also believe that anti-vaccinators with apparently healthy children are coasting on the immunity of children such as mine and are therefore benefiting from the very system they denounce. And apparently not enough people know the following: vaccinations do not make the vaccinated immune to disease. The more people abstain from vaccinating their kids, the more endangered we all are in our community. Even most non-vaxers won't dispute this. As such, vaccinations are not a "personal choice." Deciding for or against shots is the very opposite of personal: it affects everyone.
To blog casually about a serious issue such as this one is foolish. I did it and I'm sorry. But, misguided as it was, my intention was to use my crabby voice to strongly endorse the side of the vaccination debate that I feel is becoming dangerously marginalized: there is a growing trend toward demonizing vaccines in our culture and that's more troubling to me than any possible weak spots our public health system could ever be accused of.
Here's the gray area I omitted (deliberately, but unfairly) from my initial post: those who stagger shots and/or are not anti-vaccine but instead concern themselves with improving on what we have. I'm still skeptical of staggered shots, and I'm not convinced that so-called green vaccines are plausible or useful. That said, it's a more reasonable topic and therefore well-suited to more reasonable people than I. I don't think readers come to Crabmommy seeking a balanced view of much of anything, but if you have one by all means feel free to share it here or join the very vocal crowd at the Cookie forum.
I'll be moving on from this and onto matters of the mom-flap in my next post.
Get up to speed on the vaccination debate: Cookie magazine's interview with two doctors on opposite sides of the debate.More from Cookie:
- Are You Ready for Another Child?
Take this humorous quiz and to find out if you're ready or not for number two, three or higher. - Maternity Style
Cookie's rounded up the seven pregnancy wardrobe essentials to keep you as stylish as ever. - Summer Memory Contest
Submit your favorite family photo for a chance to win a spa trip! - Subscribe to Cookie for Just $1 an issue - Get an Exclusive Red Striped Tote Free!

